Quality of hire is the ultimate recruiting metric. It answers whether your process is actually delivering people who perform, grow, and stay. Yet most teams struggle to measure it. This guide provides a practical framework.

Standardized scorecards and questionnaires during the interview process create a baseline for predicting performance. Draft makes structured evaluation the default, not an afterthought.
Identify which channels produce the highest-quality hires by tracking source-of-hire data alongside performance and retention outcomes.
Stage conversion rates reveal where strong candidates drop off and where weak candidates slip through. Use Draft's analytics dashboard to tighten your funnel.
Rich candidate profiles with interview notes, scorecard ratings, and hiring committee feedback create a data trail you can analyze after the hire to identify what predicted success.
Collect post-hire feedback from managers at 30, 60, and 90 days. Correlate this with pre-hire data to continuously refine your screening criteria and interview questions.
Quality of hire is a composite metric that typically combines new hire performance ratings, retention rates, time to productivity, and hiring manager satisfaction. There is no universal formula because what constitutes quality depends on the role, the team, and the company stage.
The key is to define your own formula and apply it consistently. Choose three to four indicators that matter to your organization, weight them based on importance, and track them over time. Even an imperfect measure of quality is vastly better than no measure at all.
Teams that use structured interviews produce hires that perform 25% better on average than those using unstructured conversations. The reason is simple: structured processes evaluate candidates on relevant competencies rather than interpersonal chemistry.
Draft reinforces this structure. Custom questionnaires, standardized pipeline stages, and scorecard-based evaluation create consistency across interviewers and roles. When your process is structured, your quality data becomes reliable and actionable.
Treat quality of hire as a feedback loop. After each hiring cycle, review which screening criteria predicted success and which did not. Adjust your questionnaires, update your scorecards, and share findings with interviewers.
Source quality analysis is equally important. If referrals consistently produce higher-performing hires than job boards, shift your sourcing budget accordingly. Draft's analytics dashboard surfaces source-of-hire data so these decisions are grounded in evidence rather than assumption.
A common formula: average the new hire's performance rating, hiring manager satisfaction score, and a retention indicator (1 if retained past 12 months, 0 if not). Track the average across all hires per quarter.
Collect initial data at 30, 60, and 90 days post-hire. For a complete picture, do a 12-month review. Early indicators give you fast feedback; longer-term data confirms whether the signal was accurate.
Structured interviews and work sample assessments are the strongest predictors. They evaluate actual competencies rather than presentation skills or pedigree.
Yes, by enforcing structured evaluation, tracking source quality, and providing analytics that help you refine your process. Draft's scorecards and analytics are designed specifically for this purpose.
All the metrics you should track, including quality of hire.
Read moreCreate structured assessments that predict candidate success.
Read moreTrack quality indicators across your hiring pipeline.
Read moreBetter team evaluation leads to better hires.
Read moreDraft's structured evaluation, source tracking, and analytics give your team the data to measure and improve quality of hire with every cycle.
Get started freeNo credit card required