ATS evaluation

Find the right ATS for your hiring process

Compare applicant tracking systems using a real vacancy, the people doing the work and the features you need.

Find talent Explore features

Two colleagues discussing plans across a desk

What to focus on

Daily use

Can a reviewer find the context needed for the next decision?

Team access

Can the right people collaborate with appropriate permissions?

Plan fit

Compare required vacancies, seats and features together.

Create a shortlist around the workflow

Write down the steps between publishing a role and making a decision. Identify who owns each step and which information they need. Choose a small set of products that can demonstrate that process, then use the same scenario to evaluate each one. This is an evaluation framework, not a ranked list of vendors.

A professional writing notes beside an open laptop

Try the work before choosing the plan

Have a recruiter review an application and ask a hiring manager to leave feedback. Check careers pages, candidate records, access controls and exports using the requirements of your team. Confirm which plan includes each capability and ask about any setup or migration work.

Draft Free includes 1 open vacancy and 2 recruiter seats, a candidate pipeline, team notes and a company careers page. Pro includes 10 open vacancies and 5 recruiter seats, and adds candidate sharing, workflow automations and bulk candidate emails. Scale includes unlimited open vacancies and 10 recruiter seats.

Three colleagues exchanging ideas around a meeting table

A few useful answers.

Where can I explore Draft’s hiring tools?

The features pages walk through candidate review, hiring stages, careers pages and collaboration. Start with the workflow your team needs, then check the plan that includes it.

What is included in each plan?